There is a change blowing in the
wind today. Without going into the
details of the history of Christian involvement in government, I’ll just say I
have lived in a time when this topic was a non-issue, a time when it became a
vocal issue, a time when it was defined as a duty to take a particular stand,
and the current trend, though in its infancy, to downplay or deliberately
refuse any involvement in politics and government. Whenever I face change, I ask myself if the
new order is biblical, or the old order, or neither?
There are three primary passages
of scripture addressing the issue of Christians and our responsibilities to
governments. Titus 3:1,2 states we are
to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient and ready to do what is
good, and to be peaceable and considerate.
I Peter 2:13-15 indicates we are to, for the Lord’s sake, submit
ourselves to every authority, whether they are the kings or their
representatives. God’s will is that by
doing good we will send a loud message for the kingdom of God. “Love the brotherhood of believers, fear God,
honor the king” (NIV I Peter
2:17). The last major passage is Romans
13:1-7, which states we must submit ourselves to the governing authorities,
because every earthly power is established by God. Therefore, rebellion against any human
authority is rebellion against God. The
earthly authorities are God’s servants to do us good.
These passages need much more
examination, but it is not my purpose here to parse each phrase, just to use
them to raise another question. While
these passages speak to our responsibilities to the king, what do they say
about the king’s responsibilities? The
Romans passage indicates the king has a responsibility to God, since he is the
one who established the king in his position of authority. The king is supposed to be God’s
servant. The rulers, furthermore, are
not supposed to punish those who do good, only those who do wrong. They should not be the kind of rulers who are
feared by the Christian who is doing good.
So, the king, God’s servant, is supposed to be actively involved in
bringing about God’s will in his realm of authority. He is to seek out and punish wrongdoers (he
doesn’t bear his sword for no reason), and commend those who do what is right.
So, what if you were king? Would you have the choice of doing as you
please, using your office to further your own comfort? Would you have the choice of ignoring your
subjects, letting them fend for themselves while you live a life of
leisure? Would you have the choice of
watching from the sidelines while your appointees, evildoers, robbed and
killed, using their offices to execute their own agendas? Of course you would not have those
choices. You would be God’s servant with
the high calling of caring for all those given into your care.
Well, here’s a shocker. You are the king! If you are a citizen of the United States of
America, you are the king, or at least one part of the king. We don’t have a single king. We have a government “of the people, by the
people, and for the people” (A. Lincoln, Gettysburg
Address). We are collectively, the
king. Most of us didn’t ask for it, we
were born into it. God, in his
sovereignty, placed us in this country.
Therefore, whether we like it or not, we have the responsibility to
carry out the duties of God’s servant, the king. The president is not the king. Congress is not the king. In a democracy, or democratic republic,
individual citizens corporately are the king.
If you don’t like this situation, take it up with God. He is the one who established this government
(Romans 13:1).
Thinking about not voting this
November? I don’t believe you have that
choice. You are the king. As the king, according to Paul’s writing in
Romans, you have the responsibility to do what you can to protect and provide for
all the people in the realm. None of us have
the choice of sitting this one out. We
must make the difficult decisions. We
are the king. Don’t know how to make the
tough choices that must be made? I’ll
have some thoughts in the coming days that may help you make some of those
decisions.
Interesting perspective. I like it, but can I be a princess instead?
ReplyDeleteIf it was up to me, you could be a princess. I think of you more as a benevolent queen, however.
ReplyDeleteHey, I think I like that better than princess.
ReplyDelete